<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How not to handle a bug report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.codef00.com/2010/03/13/how-not-to-handle-a-bug-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.codef00.com/2010/03/13/how-not-to-handle-a-bug-report/</link>
	<description>Just some thoughts from a computer geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:32:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Teran</title>
		<link>http://blog.codef00.com/2010/03/13/how-not-to-handle-a-bug-report/comment-page-1/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Teran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codef00.com/?p=63#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>@Andy: as far as I can tell it has been fixed in the 4.7 tree. As far as &lt;code&gt;qDebug&lt;/code&gt;, I&#039;m not sure that counts quite the same. You basically have to treat &lt;code&gt;qDebug&lt;/code&gt; like a &lt;code&gt;printf&lt;/code&gt; when used like that and it is up to the user to ensure that a constant is passed as the first parameter. With &lt;code&gt;QT_REQUIRE_VERSION&lt;/code&gt;, there is no choice in the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy: as far as I can tell it has been fixed in the 4.7 tree. As far as <code>qDebug</code>, I&#8217;m not sure that counts quite the same. You basically have to treat <code>qDebug</code> like a <code>printf</code> when used like that and it is up to the user to ensure that a constant is passed as the first parameter. With <code>QT_REQUIRE_VERSION</code>, there is no choice in the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.codef00.com/2010/03/13/how-not-to-handle-a-bug-report/comment-page-1/#comment-3813</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codef00.com/?p=63#comment-3813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m firmly in the &lt;b&gt;no warnings&lt;/b&gt; camp myself, so I came across this post when looking for a solution.

The same problem exists with qDebug():

&lt;code&gt;qDebug( QString( &quot;foo&quot; ).toLatin1() );&lt;/code&gt;

Seems like they haven&#039;t fixed it yet - I&#039;m using git 4.6 - did you get any more feedback or is it still stuck with the documentation team?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m firmly in the <b>no warnings</b> camp myself, so I came across this post when looking for a solution.</p>
<p>The same problem exists with qDebug():</p>
<p><code>qDebug( QString( "foo" ).toLatin1() );</code></p>
<p>Seems like they haven&#8217;t fixed it yet &#8211; I&#8217;m using git 4.6 &#8211; did you get any more feedback or is it still stuck with the documentation team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WRS</title>
		<link>http://blog.codef00.com/2010/03/13/how-not-to-handle-a-bug-report/comment-page-1/#comment-2325</link>
		<dc:creator>WRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codef00.com/?p=63#comment-2325</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bring me solutions, not problems&quot; - I&#039;m honestly surprised you didn&#039;t -E compile it sooner to figure out what was going on. I do like this statement of yours though, 100% dead-on: &quot;if you cannot find a way to reconcile the warning, then odds are you don’t understand what it is trying to warn you about.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bring me solutions, not problems&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m honestly surprised you didn&#8217;t -E compile it sooner to figure out what was going on. I do like this statement of yours though, 100% dead-on: &#8220;if you cannot find a way to reconcile the warning, then odds are you don’t understand what it is trying to warn you about.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

